Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Marvin Boston, Jr., 14-12511 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-12511 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12511 Date Filed: 09/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12511 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARVIN BOSTON, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 17, 2015) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12511 Date File
More
           Case: 14-12511    Date Filed: 09/17/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                          [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 14-12511
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 6:09-cr-00066-JA-KRS-2



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

MARVIN BOSTON, JR.,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                            (September 17, 2015)

Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-12511     Date Filed: 09/17/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Judy K. Hunt, appointed counsel for Marvin Boston Jr. in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boston’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer