Filed: Aug. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15018 Date Filed: 08/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15018 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00029-HLA-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL JUNIOR KENNEDY, a.k.a. Gary Simmonds, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 4, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, and MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Jud
Summary: Case: 14-15018 Date Filed: 08/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15018 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00029-HLA-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL JUNIOR KENNEDY, a.k.a. Gary Simmonds, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 4, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, and MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judg..
More
Case: 14-15018 Date Filed: 08/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15018
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00029-HLA-JRK-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PAUL JUNIOR KENNEDY,
a.k.a. Gary Simmonds,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(August 4, 2015)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, and MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15018 Date Filed: 08/04/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Gerald S. Bettman, appointed counsel for Paul Junior Kennedy, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kennedy’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2