Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Paul Junior Kennedy, 14-15018 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-15018 Visitors: 69
Filed: Aug. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15018 Date Filed: 08/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15018 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00029-HLA-JRK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PAUL JUNIOR KENNEDY, a.k.a. Gary Simmonds, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (August 4, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, and MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Jud
More
           Case: 14-15018   Date Filed: 08/04/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-15018
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00029-HLA-JRK-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

PAUL JUNIOR KENNEDY,
a.k.a. Gary Simmonds,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (August 4, 2015)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, and MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR,
Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-15018     Date Filed: 08/04/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Gerald S. Bettman, appointed counsel for Paul Junior Kennedy, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kennedy’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer