Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-12717 April 30, 2012 JOHN LEY (D.C. Docket No. 05-00369-CV-RH) CLERK MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III, Petitioner-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. TUCKER, PAM BONDI, Respondents-Appellees. - On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida - (Opinion January 9, 2012, 666 F.3d 1265 , 11th Cir. 2012) (April 30, 2012) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSO
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 09-12717 April 30, 2012 JOHN LEY (D.C. Docket No. 05-00369-CV-RH) CLERK MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III, Petitioner-Appellant, versus KENNETH S. TUCKER, PAM BONDI, Respondents-Appellees. - On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida - (Opinion January 9, 2012, 666 F.3d 1265 , 11th Cir. 2012) (April 30, 2012) Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-12717 April 30, 2012
JOHN LEY
(D.C. Docket No. 05-00369-CV-RH) CLERK
MICHAEL DUANE ZACK, III,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. TUCKER,
PAM BONDI,
Respondents-Appellees.
---------------------------
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of Florida
--------------------------
(Opinion January 9, 2012,
666 F.3d 1265, 11th Cir. 2012)
(April 30, 2012)
Before DUBINA, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS,
WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case
should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this Court in active
service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The
previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.