Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cobb v. State, 90-1683 (1990)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 90-1683 Visitors: 25
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Oct. 08, 1990
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 567 So. 2d 554 (1990) Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 90-1683. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 8, 1990. *555 David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant. Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance: DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLAT
More
567 So. 2d 554 (1990)

Sarah Jane COBB, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 90-1683.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 8, 1990.

*555 David Davis, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Huff v. State, 566 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1990); Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315. We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR SECTION 921.087, FLORIDA STATUTES.

SHIVERS, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer