Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Perdomo v. State, 3D06-594 (2007)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 3D06-594 Visitors: 5
Judges: Cope, C.J., and Cortiã?as and Rothenberg
Filed: Mar. 07, 2007
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 960 So. 2d 11 (2007) Maykel Omar PERDOMO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 3D06-594. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 7, 2007. Martin J. Beguiristain, Miami, for appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General and Laura Moszer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before COPE, C.J., and CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ. *12 PER CURIAM. We affirm as the defendant's Motion for Discharge did not, as a matter of law, constitute a "Notice of Expiration of Speedy
More
960 So. 2d 11 (2007)

Maykel Omar PERDOMO, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-594.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 2007.

Martin J. Beguiristain, Miami, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General and Laura Moszer, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, C.J., and CORTIÑAS and ROTHENBERG, JJ.

*12 PER CURIAM.

We affirm as the defendant's Motion for Discharge did not, as a matter of law, constitute a "Notice of Expiration of Speedy Trial Time" as contemplated by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)(2). Clark v. State, 698 So. 2d 1274, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer