Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cochran v. State, 91-1471 (1992)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 91-1471 Visitors: 8
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed: Jan. 29, 1992
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2017
Summary: 592 So. 2d 784 (1992) Kenneth COCHRAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 91-1471. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. January 29, 1992. Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appellant's sentence, founded on an erroneously scored guideline, is reversed. Flow
More
592 So. 2d 784 (1992)

Kenneth COCHRAN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-1471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 29, 1992.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Robert Friedman, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Jacqueline Barakat, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant's sentence, founded on an erroneously scored guideline, is reversed. Flowers v. State, 586 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 1991); Carter v. State, 586 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1991). We recognize that the mandated rescoring will not alter the permitted range of sentencing. Nevertheless, it cannot be assumed here that the change in score might not impact the exercise of the court's discretion.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer