Filed: May 12, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-13044 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 12, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-60309-CR-KAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONALD DUHART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 12, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robin Cindy Rosen-
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 09-13044 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 12, 2010 Non-Argument Calendar JOHN LEY _ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 08-60309-CR-KAM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DONALD DUHART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 12, 2010) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robin Cindy Rosen-E..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 09-13044 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
MAY 12, 2010
Non-Argument Calendar
JOHN LEY
________________________
CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 08-60309-CR-KAM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DONALD DUHART,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
_________________________
(May 12, 2010)
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robin Cindy Rosen-Evans, appointed counsel for Donald Duhart in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant, because, in her opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Duhart’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2