Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Agency For HealthCare Administration v. Bayfront Medical Center, Inc., 13-0224 (2014)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 13-0224 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO ADMINISTRATION, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D13-0224 v. BAYFRONT MEDICAL CENTER, INC., CAPE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a CAPE CORAL HOSPITAL, CGH HOSPITAL, LTD. d/b/a CORAL GABLES HOSPITAL, DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER, LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and GULF COAST MEDICAL CE
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO ADMINISTRATION, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D13-0224 v. BAYFRONT MEDICAL CENTER, INC., CAPE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a CAPE CORAL HOSPITAL, CGH HOSPITAL, LTD. d/b/a CORAL GABLES HOSPITAL, DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER, LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a LEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and GULF COAST MEDICAL CENTER, LIFEMARK HOSPITALS OF FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a PALMETTO GENERAL HOSPITAL, MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC. d/b/a MORTON PLANT HOSPITAL and MORTON PLANT NORTH BAY HOSPITAL, PALM BEACH GARDENS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a PALM BEACH GARDENS MEDICAL CENTER, SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT d/b/a MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM d/b/a MEMORIAL REGIONAL HOSPITAL, MEMORIAL HOSPITAL WEST, MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PEMBROKE, and MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MIRAMAR, SOUTH FLORIDA BAPTIST HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a SOUTH FLORIDA BAPTIST HOSPITAL, ST. ANTHONY’S HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a ST. ANTHONY’S HOSPITAL, ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL, ST. JOSEPH’S CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL NORTH and ST. JOSEPH’S WOMEN’S HOSPITAL, TENET GOOD SAMARITAN, INC. d/b/a GOOD SAMARITAN MEDICAL CENTER, TENET HEALTHSYSTEM NORTH SHORE, INC. d/b/a NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER and NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER-FMC CAMPUS, TENET HIALEAH HEALTHSYSTEM, INC. d/b/a HIALEAH HOSPITAL, TENET ST. MARY’S, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY’S MEDICAL CENTER, TRUSTEES OF MEASE HOSPITAL, INC. d/b/a MEASE DUNEDIN HOSPITAL and MEASE COUNTRYSIDE HOSPITAL, WEST BOCA MEDICAL CENTER, INC. d/b/a WEST BOCA MEDICAL CENTER, Appellees. 2 _____________________________/ Opinion filed July 16, 2014. An appeal from the Division of Administrative Hearings. John D. C. Newton, II, Judge. Tracy Cooper George, Chief Appellate Counsel, Agency for Health Care Administration, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Joanne B. Erde of Duane Morris LLP, Miami, for Appellees. WOLF, J. Appellant, the Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA), filed an appeal of a final order of the Division of Administrative Hearings which found that AHCA was operating under an unpromulgated rule. After the issues were fully briefed and this court heard oral arguments, AHCA filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. In light of this notice, we dismiss. However, we write to specify that AHCA may not avoid its obligation to pay appellees’ reasonable appellate attorney’s fees by filing this belated notice of voluntarily dismissal. Section 120.595(4)(a), Florida Statutes, requires that “[i]f the appellate court or administrative law judge determines that” an agency is operating under an unpromulgated rule, “a judgment or order shall be entered against the agency for reasonable costs and reasonable attorney’s fees, unless the agency demonstrates that the statement is required by the Federal Government to implement or retain a delegated or approved program or to meet a condition to receipt of federal funds.” 3 Here, the administrative law judge (ALJ) found that AHCA was operating under an unpromulgated rule which was not required by the Federal Government. AHCA has sought to voluntarily dismiss this court’s review of that finding. Thus, the ALJ’s finding entitles appellees to reasonable attorney’s fees during the entire duration of these proceedings. As such, we accept the voluntary dismissal, but we grant appellees’ motion for appellate attorney’s fees and remand for a determination of the amount if the parties are unable to reach an agreement. DISMISSED. APPELLEES’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES GRANTED. PADOVANO and RAY, JJ., CONCUR. 4
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer