Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Eric E. Balcom v. State of Florida, 14-1400 (2014)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 14-1400 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ERIC E. BALCOM, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D14-1400 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed December 9, 2014. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Dawn Caloca-Johnson, Judge. Eric E. Balcom, pro se, Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The order denying the appellant’s petition se
More
                                       IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                       FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

ERIC E. BALCOM,                        NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                       FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Appellant,                       DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                     CASE NO. 1D14-1400

STATE OF FLORIDA,

      Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 9, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Dawn Caloca-Johnson, Judge.

Eric E. Balcom, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.




PER CURIAM.
      The order denying the appellant’s petition seeking to file a belated motion

for postconviction relief is reversed. The case is remanded for an evidentiary

hearing to determine the validity of the appellant’s claim that counsel failed to file

a timely postconviction motion, without prejudice to the state’s right to raise the

defense of laches. See Strong v. State, 
851 So. 2d 758
, 758 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
(concluding that the burden was on the state to establish laches as a defense to an

otherwise timely petition seeking to file a belated postconviction motion); Sanchez

v. State, 
848 So. 2d 1253
, 1254 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“If the State has a basis on

which to dispute the defendant’s entitlement to a belated filing under [r]ule

3.850(b)(3), then there must be a hearing on that issue.”).


      REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK, and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer