Filed: Jul. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 8, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-994 Lower Tribunal No. 14-17756 _ Jose A. Garcia, Appellant, vs. Ileana Collazo, Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge. Jose A. Garcia, in proper person. Bello and Martinez and Ian Illych Martinez and Joel Bello, for appellee. Before SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and FERNANDEZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 8, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-994 Lower Tribunal No. 14-17756 _ Jose A. Garcia, Appellant, vs. Ileana Collazo, Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge. Jose A. Garcia, in proper person. Bello and Martinez and Ian Illych Martinez and Joel Bello, for appellee. Before SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and FERNANDEZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is a..
More
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 8, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D15-994 Lower Tribunal No. 14-17756 ________________ Jose A. Garcia, Appellant, vs. Ileana Collazo, Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Antonio Arzola, Judge. Jose A. Garcia, in proper person. Bello and Martinez and Ian Illych Martinez and Joel Bello, for appellee. Before SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and FERNANDEZ, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an Order granting a motion for partial summary judgment. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss claiming that the Order is not an appealable order. Appellant claims this Court has jurisdiction under Rule 9.130 (a)(3)(C)(iv), but Appellee is correct that we do not. We dismiss the appeal. See Rule 9.130 and the comment to the Rule amended in 2000 which state “Subdivision (a)(3)(C)(iv) allowing review of orders determining ‘the issue of liability in favor of a party seeking affirmative relief’ was deleted so that such orders are not appealable until conclusion of the case.” Appeal dismissed. 2
