Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hale v. State, 2D14-5494 (2015)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D14-5494 Visitors: 25
Filed: Sep. 18, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TROY E. HALE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-5494 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _) Opinion filed September 18, 2015. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge. KHOUZAM, Judge. Troy Hale appeals the order denying his motion for jail credit under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.8
More
                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                       MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                               IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                               OF FLORIDA

                                               SECOND DISTRICT

TROY E. HALE,                      )
                                   )
           Appellant,              )
                                   )
v.                                 )                                Case No. 2D14-5494
                                   )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                  )
                                   )
           Appellee.               )
___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 18, 2015.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.




KHOUZAM, Judge.


              Troy Hale appeals the order denying his motion for jail credit under Florida

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm without prejudice to Hale's right to file a

timely motion under rule 3.850. See Johnson v. State, 
60 So. 3d 1045
, 1052 (Fla.

2011). We caution, however, that "[w]hen a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a

negotiated plea, or to attack it collaterally, if he is successful he loses the benefit of the

bargain he has elected to attack." 
Id. (quoting Moreland
v. Smith, 
664 So. 2d 1039
,

1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)).
CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.




                                    -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer