Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Millette v. State, 2D14-5678 (2015)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D14-5678 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT REYNALDO MILLETTE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-5678 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _) Opinion filed October 30, 2015. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Donna Padar Berlin, Judge. Reynaldo Millette, pro se. PER CURIAM. Reynaldo Millette appeals the postconviction court's order dismissing a
More
               NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
                      MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

                                            IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

                                            OF FLORIDA

                                            SECOND DISTRICT



REYNALDO MILLETTE,                 )
                                   )
           Appellant,              )
                                   )
v.                                 )              Case No. 2D14-5678
                                   )
STATE OF FLORIDA,                  )
                                   )
           Appellee.               )
___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 30, 2015.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.
9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for
Sarasota County; Donna Padar Berlin,
Judge.

Reynaldo Millette, pro se.


PER CURIAM.

             Reynaldo Millette appeals the postconviction court's order dismissing as

untimely his motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the

court improperly dismissed Millette's second amended motion filed on May 23, 2013, we

reverse and remand for the court to reconsider Millette's claims—none of which were

determined on the merits or refuted by the record. See Millette v. State, 
148 So. 3d 538
(Fla. 2d DCA 2014); see also Rosier v. State, 
144 So. 3d 604
, 605 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
(explaining that a timely filed rule 3.850 motion may be amended prior to the

postconviction court's disposition even after the two-year time period for filing a timely

motion under the rule has expired).

              Reversed and remanded.


NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.




                                            -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer