Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joevel Williams v. State of Florida, 4D14-2553 (2015)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 4D14-2553 Visitors: 24
Filed: Nov. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT JOEVEL WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D14-2553 [November 4, 2015] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Matthew I. Destry, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13016271CF10A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen Geesey, Assistant Attorney Gener
More
       DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                            FOURTH DISTRICT

                          JOEVEL WILLIAMS,
                              Appellant,

                                    v.

                         STATE OF FLORIDA,
                              Appellee.

                             No. 4D14-2553

                           [November 4, 2015]

   Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Matthew I. Destry, Judge; L.T. Case No.
13016271CF10A.

  Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Murphy, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

   Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen Geesey,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

   Appellant appeals the judgment and sentence entered after his no
contest plea to one count of unlawfully carrying a concealed firearm.
Appellant argues that the court erred because although it granted his
motion for a competency hearing under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.210(b), the court accepted his plea and sentenced him without
conducting the hearing. In order to raise this issue on appeal, Appellant
was required to file a motion to withdraw plea. Burns v. State, 
884 So. 2d 1010
, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). See also Bailey v. State, 
21 So. 3d 147
,
150 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009). Because Appellant failed to do so, we can only
review for fundamental error. 
Burns, 884 So. 2d at 1012
. As this Court
established in Burns, a court’s failure to hold a Rule 3.210(b) competency
hearing does not rise to the level of fundamental error. 
Id. at 1014.
   Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence without prejudice to
Appellant’s right to seek appropriate post-conviction relief in the trial
court.
  Affirmed.

STEVENSON and CONNER, JJ., concur.

                         *           *    *

  Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer