Filed: Nov. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LAVONTRAI T. DARBY, ) DOC #T74933, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-5871 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _ ) Opinion filed November 4, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Att
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LAVONTRAI T. DARBY, ) DOC #T74933, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-5871 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _ ) Opinion filed November 4, 2015. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Atto..
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
LAVONTRAI T. DARBY, )
DOC #T74933, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D14-5871
)
STATE OF FLORIDA, )
)
Appellee. )
________________________________ )
Opinion filed November 4, 2015.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Kimberly K.
Fernandez, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,
and Megan Olson, Assistant Public
Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Lavontrai T. Darby appeals the order revoking his probation and his
resulting sentence. The record supports the trial court's finding that Mr. Darby
substantially violated the conditions of his probation by committing two new law
violations contrary to condition 5 of his probation. Thus we affirm the order of
revocation of probation and the sentence imposed. However, we remand for the entry
of a corrected revocation order.
In its order of revocation, the trial court did not state the conditions that Mr.
Darby was found to have violated. Accordingly, we remand for the entry of an amended
order of revocation setting forth the conditions violated and conforming to the trial
court's oral pronouncements made during the revocation hearing. See Nolen v. State,
627 So. 2d 580, 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Oliver v. State,
819 So. 2d 816, 816 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2002). Mr. Darby need not be present for this ministerial task.
Affirmed; remanded with directions.
WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
-2-