Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DENISE COLLINS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-1885 DWAYNE COLLINS, SR., Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 1, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge. Brandon M. Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm, LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Paul W. Darby and Thomas Holden, of Holden & Darby, P.A., Tavares, for Appellee. PE
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DENISE COLLINS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-1885 DWAYNE COLLINS, SR., Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 1, 2016 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Mark J. Hill, Judge. Brandon M. Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm, LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Paul W. Darby and Thomas Holden, of Holden & Darby, P.A., Tavares, for Appellee. PER..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DENISE COLLINS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-1885
DWAYNE COLLINS, SR.,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed April 1, 2016
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Lake County,
Mark J. Hill, Judge.
Brandon M. Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm,
LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant.
Paul W. Darby and Thomas Holden, of
Holden & Darby, P.A., Tavares, for
Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Denise Collins appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage that provided,
inter alia, for her former husband to have sole parental responsibility on decisions
relating to the parties’ minor children’s education and medical care. Although we
conclude that the trial court’s factual findings support its decision, we remand the case
because the final judgment failed to include a specific finding that shared parental
responsibility would be detrimental to the children. See Henderson v. Henderson,
162
So. 3d 203, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). The final judgment is otherwise affirmed.
AFFIRMED, IN PART; REVERSED, IN PART; REMANDED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.
2