Filed: May 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: wIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PEDRO BENEVIDES, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-4217 YOLANDA REESE, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed June 3, 2016 Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, George Paulk, Judge. Pedro Benevides, Coleman, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Pedro Benevides, who is currently in federal custody, purports to appeal matt
Summary: wIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED PEDRO BENEVIDES, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D15-4217 YOLANDA REESE, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed June 3, 2016 Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, George Paulk, Judge. Pedro Benevides, Coleman, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Pedro Benevides, who is currently in federal custody, purports to appeal matte..
More
wIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
PEDRO BENEVIDES,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D15-4217
YOLANDA REESE,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 3, 2016
Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit
Court for Brevard County,
George Paulk, Judge.
Pedro Benevides, Coleman, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Pedro Benevides, who is currently in federal custody, purports to appeal matters
related to the care and custody of his child. Yet he has not provided this Court with the
record on appeal, a copy of the final judgment that he appeals, or any transcript of the
trial for our review. The absence of these documents precludes a meaningful review. See
Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(d) (requiring a copy of the order under review be attached to the
notice of appeal); Fla. R. App. P. 9.200(e) (establishing duty of appellant to ensure record
is prepared and transmitted); Smith v. Orhama, Inc.,
907 So. 2d 594, 596 (Fla. 3d DCA
2005) (affirming based on appellants’ failure to submit a transcript for meaningful review).
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
2