Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alfred Curtis Dinkins v. State of Florida, 16-1946 (2016)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 16-1946 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ALFRED CURTIS DINKINS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D16-1946 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _/ Opinion filed July 7, 2016. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Original Jurisdiction. Alfred Curtis Dinkins, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. This petition for writ of habeas corpus is dism
More
                                        IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
                                        FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

ALFRED CURTIS DINKINS,                  NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                        FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
      Petitioner,                       DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v.                                      CASE NO. 1D16-1946

STATE OF FLORIDA,

     Respondent.
___________________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Alfred Curtis Dinkins, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.




PER CURIAM.

      This petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed pursuant to Baker v. State,

878 So. 2d 1236
(Fla. 2004) (reiterating that habeas corpus cannot be used to litigate

issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction

motions).
      This court has determined that the petition for writ of habeas corpus raised a

frivolous claim which subjects petitioner to the imposition of sanctions pursuant to

section 944.279, Florida Statutes. Accordingly, a certified copy of this opinion shall be

provided to the Florida Department of Corrections to be forwarded to the appropriate

institution or facility for disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the

Department as provided in section 944.279.

B.L. THOMAS, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer