Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Glass v. Glass, 15-0013 (2016)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 15-0013 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 06, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 06, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D15-13 Lower Tribunal No. 11-37636 _ Richard Randal Glass, Appellant, vs. Natalie Ann Glass, Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, George A. Sarduy, Judge. Jay M. Levy, P.A., and Jay M. Levy, for appellant. Bofill Law Group, and Jose C. Bofill, for appellee. Before SUAREZ, C.J., and WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ. SUAREZ, C.J. R
More
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 06, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D15-13 Lower Tribunal No. 11-37636 ________________ Richard Randal Glass, Appellant, vs. Natalie Ann Glass, Appellee. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, George A. Sarduy, Judge. Jay M. Levy, P.A., and Jay M. Levy, for appellant. Bofill Law Group, and Jose C. Bofill, for appellee. Before SUAREZ, C.J., and WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ. SUAREZ, C.J. Richard Randal Glass, former Husband, appeals from a Final Judgment of Dissolution. We affirm in all respects, but remand solely for the trial court to correct the calculation of the amount of unpaid wages to Natalie Ann Glass, former Wife. The trial court correctly determined that the Husband owed the Wife $52,982.43 in wages earned but not received in 2011, in addition to the $219,226.86 he owes her for unpaid wages from 2006-2010. The Amended Final Judgment, however, added those two amounts and declared the total, $324,025.50, as what the Husband owed the Wife for 2006-2010, and then incorrectly added another $52,982.43 for 2011. The Wife concedes that this is incorrect. We affirm the Final Judgment of Dissolution in all respects, but remand to correct the Final Judgment by subtracting $52,982.43 from the total the Husband owes to the Wife. Affirmed; remanded for correction of calculation. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer