IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                              FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


BRETT FOURNIER,

              Appellant,

 v.                                                     Case No. 5D16-2329

STATE OF FLORIDA,

              Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Orange County,
Christi L. Underwood, Judge.

Matthews R. Bark, Altamonte Springs,
for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente and
Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorneys
General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

      Brett Fournier appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his amended

motion for postconviction relief, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.850. Fournier argues that the records attached by the court to the denial order do not

conclusively refute his claim that his trial counsel was ineffective when counsel failed to

timely convey Fournier’s acceptance of the plea offer from the State. Having not heard
from Fournier, the State revoked its offer, and Fournier eventually received a longer

prison sentence than the sentence previously offered by the State. We reverse the order

on appeal.

       In his amended motion, Fournier specifically alleged that he had received a plea

offer from the State of ten years’ incarceration in this case, to be served concurrently with

a fifteen-year prison sentence imposed in an unrelated case. Fournier further alleged

that he accepted the State’s offer and so advised his counsel but that counsel never

relayed this acceptance to the prosecutor prior to the offer being revoked by the State.

Lastly, Fournier asserted that if his counsel had timely conveyed his acceptance, the

State would not have revoked the offer, the trial court would have accepted its terms, and,

as a result, Fournier's sentence would have been less severe than his present prison

sentence.

       "To uphold [a] trial court’s summary denial of claims raised in a 3.850 motion, the

claims must be either facially invalid or conclusively refuted by the record." Foster v.

State, 

, 914 (Fla. 2002) (quoting Peede v. State, 

, 257 (Fla.

1999)). Furthermore, because no evidentiary hearing was held, "we must accept the

defendant’s factual allegations as true to the extent that they are not refuted by the

record." Occhicone v. State, 

, 1041 (Fla. 2000) (citing Peede, 

at 257 (additional citations omitted)).

       "Counsel’s failure to convey a client’s acceptance of a plea offer to the State can

constitute ineffective assistance of counsel." Morris v. State, 

, 697 (Fla. 5th

DCA 2010) (citing White v. State, 

(Fla. 2d DCA 1999)). In Birch v. State,

(Fla. 5th DCA 2007), we determined that allegations in a rule 3.850




                                             2
motion for postconviction relief that were similar to those raised here stated a prima facie

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel that, unless conclusively refuted by the record,

entitled the defendant to an evidentiary hearing. 

.

       Although the trial court did attach some court records to its denial order, we find

that the records do not conclusively refute Fournier’s claim. Accordingly, we reverse the

order on appeal and remand with instructions that the trial court either conduct an

evidentiary hearing on Fournier’s claim or attach additional portions of the record that

conclusively refute the claim.

       REVERSED and REMANDED.

BERGER, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS JJ., concur.




                                             3