Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Huff v. State, 2D15-1630 (2016)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 2D15-1630 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOHN CECIL HUFF, DOC #498690 ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1630 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 14, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge. John Huff, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for App
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JOHN CECIL HUFF, DOC #498690 ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-1630 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 14, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge. John Huff, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gillian N. Leytham, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. We affirm the postconviction court's denial of Huff's motion for postconviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In Issue VI of his pro se brief on appeal, however, Huff appears to argue that, upon revocation of his probation in case no. 12-CF-004128, the trial court imposed an illegal sentence on count one because of a scoresheet error. Huff did not preserve this issue for review. Accordingly, our affirmance is without prejudice to Huff's right to file a legally sufficient motion for relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Affirmed. CASANUEVA, SLEET, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer