Filed: Dec. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT AMY ROSE PRATT a/k/a AMY ROSE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-545 ) BLAKE EDWARD PRATT, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 28, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tracy Sheehan, Judge. Peter N. Macaluso of Law Office of Peter N. Macaluso, Tampa, for Appellant. Jeffrey Sirmons, Brandon, for Appellee. MORRIS, Judge. Amy Ros
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT AMY ROSE PRATT a/k/a AMY ROSE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-545 ) BLAKE EDWARD PRATT, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 28, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tracy Sheehan, Judge. Peter N. Macaluso of Law Office of Peter N. Macaluso, Tampa, for Appellant. Jeffrey Sirmons, Brandon, for Appellee. MORRIS, Judge. Amy Rose..
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
AMY ROSE PRATT a/k/a AMY ROSE, )
)
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Case No. 2D16-545
)
BLAKE EDWARD PRATT, )
)
Appellee. )
)
Opinion filed December 28, 2016.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for
Hillsborough County; Tracy Sheehan,
Judge.
Peter N. Macaluso of Law Office of Peter
N. Macaluso, Tampa, for Appellant.
Jeffrey Sirmons, Brandon, for Appellee.
MORRIS, Judge.
Amy Rose Pratt, the former wife, appeals the final judgment of dissolution
of her marriage to Blake Edward Pratt, the former husband. We dismiss the portion of
the former wife's appeal challenging the trial court's ruling on attorneys' fees. See Card
v. Card,
122 So. 3d 436, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (dismissing the portion of the former
wife's challenge to the final judgment of dissolution that addressed attorneys' fees
because not only was the order ambiguous as to entitlement but it also failed to set an
amount of fees thereby rendering that portion of the final judgment nonfinal and
nonappealable); Zuberer v. Zuberer,
28 So. 3d 993, 993-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)
(dismissing as premature the challenge to the trial court's ruling on attorneys' fees
where the trial court determined entitlement but reserved on the amount). In all other
respects, the final judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.
KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
-2-