Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fouche v. Pilot Catastrophe, 5D16-848 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D16-848 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED SUZANNE FOUCHE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D16-848 PILOT CATASTROPHE SERVICES, INC., Appellee. _/ Opinion filed April 21, 2017 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Melanie Chase, Judge. Suzanne Fouche, Orlando, pro se. Marc A. Sugerman, of Allen, Norton & Blue, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee. PALMER, J. Suzanne Fouche appeal
More
          IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                               FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED


SUZANNE FOUCHE,

               Appellant,

 v.                                                     Case No. 5D16-848

PILOT CATASTROPHE SERVICES, INC.,

               Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 21, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Seminole County,
Melanie Chase, Judge.

Suzanne Fouche, Orlando, pro se.

Marc A. Sugerman, of Allen, Norton &
Blue, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee.

PALMER, J.

      Suzanne Fouche appeals the order entered by the trial court enforcing this court's

mandate which directed the court to send this matter to arbitration.1 We reverse the trial

court’s order dismissing, rather than staying, Fourche's lawsuit pending arbitration. We

otherwise affirm.




      1   Pilot Catastrophe Servs., Inc. v. Fouche, 
145 So. 3d 151
(Fla. 5th DCA 2014).
       In the previous appeal, we reversed the trial court's order denying the motion to

compel arbitration filed by appellee, Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. We remanded the

matter to the trial court with instructions to submit the case to arbitration. On remand,

Fouche filed a motion for entry of an order on remand. After a hearing, the trial court

entered an order submitting the case to arbitration and dismissing Fouche's lawsuit

without prejudice. Fouche contends that the trial court erred in dismissing, rather than

staying, her lawsuit. We agree.

       Pursuant to section 682.03 of the Florida Statutes, the imposition of a stay, not an

order of dismissal, is the appropriate disposition when a matter is sent to arbitration. The

statute reads, in pertinent part. as follows:

              682.03. Proceedings to compel and to stay arbitration
                                       ....

              (7) If the court orders arbitration, the court on just terms shall
              stay any judicial proceeding that involves a claim subject to
              the arbitration.

§ 682.03(7), Fla. Stat. (2015). Our court recently recognized the appropriate disposition

under facts similar to the instant case. In Timber Pines Plaza, LLC v. Zabrzyski, No.

5D16- 3275 (Fla. 5th DCA March 10, 2017), we reversed the trial court's order denying a

motion to compel arbitration and remanded with instructions to send the matter to

arbitration and to stay the litigation, citing to section 682.03(7).

       Accordingly, the trial court's order is reversed in part and this matter is remanded

with instructions to vacate the dismissal language and to impose a stay of the instant

lawsuit. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

       AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA and EVANDER, JJ., concur.



                                                2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer