Filed: Jul. 03, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DONALD DAVIS, JR., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-671 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 7, 2017 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Marc L. Lubet, Judge. Donald Davis, Jr., Crawfordville, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beac
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DONALD DAVIS, JR., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-671 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 7, 2017 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Marc L. Lubet, Judge. Donald Davis, Jr., Crawfordville, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DONALD DAVIS, JR.,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-671
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 7, 2017
3.800 Appeal from the Circuit
Court for Orange County,
Marc L. Lubet, Judge.
Donald Davis, Jr., Crawfordville, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM
This is an appeal from the trial court's order below granting in part and denying in
part Appellant's motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.800(a). On appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred when it
modified his sentence without holding a resentencing hearing. We agree, and remand
for resentencing. See § 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2016); § 921.1402(2)(d), Fla. Stat.
(2016); see also Kelsey v. State,
206 So. 3d 5, 10-11 (Fla. 2016) ("Because we determine
that resentencing is the appropriate remedy, the trial courts may embrace all of the
provisions of chapter 2014–220 [which was codified in sections 775.082, 921.1401, and
921.1402, Florida Statutes] and are not required to limit themselves to only applying the
judicial review provision."). The trial court's order is otherwise affirmed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.
TORPY, EVANDER, and EISNAUGLE JJ., concur.
2