Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lanza v. Lanza, 17-0379 (2017)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 17-0379 Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 13, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. _ No. 3D17-379 Lower Tribunal No. 15-4295 _ Teresita Abadin Lanza, Appellant, vs. Carlos Lanza, Appellee. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bernard S. Shapiro, Judge. Perez-Abreu & Martin-Lavielle, P.A., and Andy W. Acosta and Javier Perez-Abreu, for appellant. Greene Smith Jean, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene
More
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 13, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D17-379 Lower Tribunal No. 15-4295 ________________ Teresita Abadin Lanza, Appellant, vs. Carlos Lanza, Appellee. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bernard S. Shapiro, Judge. Perez-Abreu & Martin-Lavielle, P.A., and Andy W. Acosta and Javier Perez-Abreu, for appellant. Greene Smith Jean, P.A., and Cynthia L. Greene, Laura Davis Smith, and Alicia M. De La O, for appellee. Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM. We affirm the trial court’s abatement of alimony and child support. We do so with the understanding that the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the hearing allows the former wife to conduct discovery and, if necessary, seek relief from the trial court in relation to the propriety, amount, and duration of the abatement. Affirmed. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer