Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Newman v. Hirst, 5D17-2482 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D17-2482 Visitors: 2
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID NEWMAN, Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D17-2482 GLENN HIRST and WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondents. _/ Opinion filed February 16, 2018 Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Keith F. White, Judge. Christopher V. Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Petitioner. Brian D. St
More
           IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
                                FIFTH DISTRICT

                                                  NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
                                                  FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
                                                  DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DAVID NEWMAN,

               Petitioner,

 v.                                                               Case No. 5D17-2482

GLENN HIRST and
WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.,

               Respondents.

_________________________________________/

Opinion filed February 16, 2018

Petition for Certiorari Review of Order
from the Circuit Court for Orange County,
Keith F. White, Judge.

Christopher V. Carlyle, of The Carlyle
Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for
Petitioner.

Brian D. Stokes and Brandon M. Smith, of
Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey,
P.A., Orlando, for Respondents.


WALLIS, J.

      David Newman petitions this court for a writ of certiorari, seeking to quash the trial

court's order finding that he expressly waived all privilege objections to the respondents'

Boecher1 interrogatories. We find that the trial court departed from the essential




      1   Allstate Ins. v. Boecher, 
733 So. 2d 993
(Fla. 1999).
requirements of the law by determining that Newman's agreement to "answer" discovery

requests constituted an express waiver of all privileges. See Paradise Divers, Inc. v. Upmal,

943 So. 2d 812
, 814 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Liberty Mut. Ins. v. Lease Am., Inc., 
735 So. 2d 560
, 561–62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We grant the petition, quash the order, and remand to

the trial court for further proceedings.

       PETITION GRANTED.


PALMER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.




                                             2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer