Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Marie Lucie Tondreau, 15-11484 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 15-11484 Visitors: 68
Filed: Sep. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-11484 Date Filed: 09/27/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-11484 _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-20349-RNS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIE LUCIE TONDREAU, a.k.a. Lucie Tondreau, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (September 27, 2016) Before HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: * Honora
More
Case: 15-11484 Date Filed: 09/27/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 15-11484 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-20349-RNS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MARIE LUCIE TONDREAU, a.k.a. Lucie Tondreau, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (September 27, 2016) Before HULL and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: * Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. Case: 15-11484 Date Filed: 09/27/2016 Page: 2 of 2 Marie Lucie Tondreau appeals her convictions and sentences for one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. ' 1349, and four counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. ' ' 1342 and 1343. Regarding her conviction, Tondreau argues that the district court erred in denying her motions for judgment of acquittal and that the district court committed cumulative evidentiary errors, warranting reversal. As to her sentence, Tondreau contends that the district court erred in imposing a two-level mass-marketing enhancement under U.S.S.G. ' 2B1.1(b)(2)(A)(ii) and erred in declining to apply a two-point downward adjustment under ' 3B1.2 for a minor role in the offense. After review and oral argument, we find no reversible error. AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer