Filed: Jul. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ORLANDO ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-1135 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 20, 2018 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Kelly J. McKibben, Judge. Orlando Alvarez, Daytona Beach, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Orlando Alvarez appeals the summary denial of his amended Florida R
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ORLANDO ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-1135 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed July 20, 2018 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Kelly J. McKibben, Judge. Orlando Alvarez, Daytona Beach, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Orlando Alvarez appeals the summary denial of his amended Florida Ru..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ORLANDO ALVAREZ,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-1135
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed July 20, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Brevard County,
Kelly J. McKibben, Judge.
Orlando Alvarez, Daytona Beach, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Orlando Alvarez appeals the summary denial of his amended Florida Rule of
Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We reverse and remand the
summary denial of Alvarez’s first ground for relief, alleging that his trial counsel failed to
depose the victim and other relevant witnesses. The ground, as pled, was facially
insufficient but Alvarez was not put on notice of the defect. The postconviction court
should have granted Alvarez leave to amend. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(3); Osorio v. State,
233 So. 3d 516, 517 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). Should Alvarez amend this claim, if the
postconviction court wants to summarily deny relief again, it must attach records that
conclusively refute this ground for relief. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5); Castro v. State,
240
So. 3d 877, 878 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018) (indicating that statement of satisfaction with
counsel alone is generally insufficient to conclusively refute claim that counsel was
ineffective for failing to call witness). In all other respects, we affirm the trial court's
order.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.
COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
2