Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lisenbee v. Whitman, 5D18-396 (2018)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 5D18-396 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CORY LISENBEE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-396 DEAN WHITMAN, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed August 17, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, John Galluzzo, Judge. Cory Lisenbee, Lake Mary, pro se. Joseph S. Justice, of Ringer, Henry, Buckley & Seacord, PA, Orlando, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The trial court properly dismiss
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CORY LISENBEE, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-396 DEAN WHITMAN, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed August 17, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, John Galluzzo, Judge. Cory Lisenbee, Lake Mary, pro se. Joseph S. Justice, of Ringer, Henry, Buckley & Seacord, PA, Orlando, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The trial court properly dismissed Appellant’s amended complaint with prejudice. The applicable statute of limitations had run, and Appellant admittedly failed to comply or plead compliance with the mandatory presuit investigation and notice requirements set forth in chapter 766, Florida Statutes. AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, EVANDER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer