Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TRAVIS RAY STUCKY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-580 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed August 24, 2018 3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Robin C. Lemonidis, Judge. Travis Ray Stucky, Bushnell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The trial court denied Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Proced
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TRAVIS RAY STUCKY, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D18-580 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed August 24, 2018 3.853 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Robin C. Lemonidis, Judge. Travis Ray Stucky, Bushnell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. PER CURIAM. The trial court denied Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedu..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
TRAVIS RAY STUCKY,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-580
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed August 24, 2018
3.853 Appeal from the Circuit
Court for Brevard County,
Robin C. Lemonidis, Judge.
Travis Ray Stucky, Bushnell, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The trial court denied Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 motion
for DNA testing because it was facially insufficient. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(c)(2). We
agree and affirm without prejudice. Appellant may refile a facially sufficient motion if he
can do so in good faith. See Rosa v. State,
147 So. 3d 583, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014);
Luckner v. State,
979 So. 2d 1121, 1121–22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008).
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, C.J., LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.