Filed: Sep. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED RICKY VIVEIROS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-3496 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed September 14, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Kimberly M. Shepard, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallah
Summary: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED RICKY VIVEIROS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D17-3496 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _/ Opinion filed September 14, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Kimberly M. Shepard, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallaha..
More
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
RICKY VIVEIROS,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-3496
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed September 14, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court
for Orange County,
Kimberly M. Shepard, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and
Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender,
Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona
Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm, without further discussion, Ricky Viveiros’s judgment and sentence
imposed in this case. However, we remand for the trial court to enter a written order to
specifically reflect the conditions of violation that the trial court orally announced. See
Lewis v. State,
8 So. 3d 370, 371 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009); Payne v. State,
920 So. 2d 742,
743 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006). Further, the record reflects two condition 5 violations but the
State only proceeded on one condition 5 violation. On remand, the written order should
only reflect the violation for disorderly intoxication. See Kemp v. State,
135 So. 3d 347,
347-48 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with Instructions.
ORFINGER, BERGER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
2