Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 3, 2018. _ No. 3D18-768 Lower Tribunal No. 04-29879 _ Luis La-Casse, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge. Luis La-Casse, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. In La-Casse v.
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 3, 2018. _ No. 3D18-768 Lower Tribunal No. 04-29879 _ Luis La-Casse, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto, Judge. Luis La-Casse, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ. ON CONFESSION OF ERROR PER CURIAM. In La-Casse v. ..
More
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed October 3, 2018.
________________
No. 3D18-768
Lower Tribunal No. 04-29879
________________
Luis La-Casse,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. Cueto,
Judge.
Luis La-Casse, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
In La-Casse v. State,
223 So. 3d 1129, 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017), this Court
reversed the trial court’s order precluding Luis La-Casse from filing any further
pro se post-conviction pleadings in lower court case number F04-29879, and
remanded for entry of a Show Cause Order “to provide La-Casse the opportunity
to demonstrate why an order precluding pro se filings should not be entered.” On
remand, on October 12, 2017, the trial court entered a Show Cause Order.
In November 2017, La-Casse filed a timely response to the Show Cause
Order. La-Casse later filed an amended response. For reasons that are unclear in
the record, the trial court entered two separate orders “mooting” both La-Casse’s
response and amended response to the Show Cause Order. Indeed, the trial court
docket does not reflect that the trial court, on remand, ever issued an order
determining whether La-Casse should be precluded from further pro se filings in
lower court case number F04-29879.
Based on the record before us and the State’s proper and commendable
confession of error that the trial court incorrectly mooted La-Casse’s responses to
the Show Cause Order, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. On
remand, the trial court should consider La-Casse’s amended response to the trial
court’s October 12, 2017 Show Cause Order, and adjudicate whether La-Casse
should be precluded from further pro se filings in lower case number F04-29879.
This Court expresses no opinion on that issue.
2
Reversed and remanded.
3