Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-14449 Date Filed: 10/04/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-14449 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00082-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON BRADLEY THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (October 4, 2016) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-14449 Date Filed
Summary: Case: 15-14449 Date Filed: 10/04/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-14449 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00082-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON BRADLEY THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (October 4, 2016) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-14449 Date Filed:..
More
Case: 15-14449 Date Filed: 10/04/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-14449
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00082-CG-B-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JASON BRADLEY THOMAS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(October 4, 2016)
Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-14449 Date Filed: 10/04/2016 Page: 2 of 2
Cindy W. Powell, appointed counsel for Jason B. Thomas in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thomas’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2