Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Jason Bradley Thomas, 15-14449 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 15-14449 Visitors: 73
Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-14449 Date Filed: 10/04/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-14449 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00082-CG-B-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JASON BRADLEY THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (October 4, 2016) Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-14449 Date Filed
More
           Case: 15-14449   Date Filed: 10/04/2016   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 15-14449
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-00082-CG-B-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

JASON BRADLEY THOMAS,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Alabama
                      ________________________

                            (October 4, 2016)

Before WILSON, JORDAN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 15-14449     Date Filed: 10/04/2016    Page: 2 of 2


      Cindy W. Powell, appointed counsel for Jason B. Thomas in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Thomas’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer