Filed: Oct. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-10230 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02678-SCJ CHERI RAU, Plaintiff – Appellant, versus D. C. SCHWEIZER, Defendant- Appellee, ANDREW SALIBA, Defendant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (October 13, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/
Summary: Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 16-10230 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02678-SCJ CHERI RAU, Plaintiff – Appellant, versus D. C. SCHWEIZER, Defendant- Appellee, ANDREW SALIBA, Defendant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (October 13, 2016) Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/1..
More
Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 16-10230
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cv-02678-SCJ
CHERI RAU,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
versus
D. C. SCHWEIZER,
Defendant- Appellee,
ANDREW SALIBA,
Defendant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(October 13, 2016)
Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
Case: 16-10230 Date Filed: 10/13/2016 Page: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a police officer, plaintiff claims that
the officer procured her false arrest and malicious prosecution in violation of the
Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. The District Court granted the officer
summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity. The plaintiff appeals.
We conclude that summary judgment was appropriate for the reasons stated in the
District Court’s dispositive order of December 22, 2015.
AFFIRMED.
2