Filed: Jan. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. _ No. 3D18-0991 Lower Tribunal No. 17-16780 _ Joseph Smith, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Nushin G. Sayfie, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest- Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before EM
Summary: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 23, 2019. _ No. 3D18-0991 Lower Tribunal No. 17-16780 _ Joseph Smith, Appellant, vs. The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Nushin G. Sayfie, Judge. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest- Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMA..
More
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed January 23, 2019.
________________
No. 3D18-0991
Lower Tribunal No. 17-16780
________________
Joseph Smith,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Nushin G. Sayfie,
Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Shannon Hemmendinger, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-
Turken, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and HENDON, J., and LAGOA, Associate Judge.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
LAGOA, Associate Judge.
Joseph Smith (“Smith”) appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of
a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and resisting an officer
without violence, arguing that his trial was fundamentally flawed due to the trial
court’s failure to instruct the jury as to reasonable doubt. As the State correctly
concedes, the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury as to Florida Standard Jury
Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 Plea of Not Guilty; Reasonable Doubt, and Burden of
Proof, or any similar instruction, constituted fundamental error. See Cavagnaro v.
State,
117 So. 3d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (finding fundamental error where
the jury charge did not include Florida Standard Jury Instruction (Criminal) 3.7 or
any similar instruction); see also Curry v. State,
169 So. 3d 1258, 1258 (Fla. 5th
DCA 2015); Burnette v. State,
103 So. 3d 1059 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Accordingly,
we reverse Smith’s conviction and remand for a new trial.
Reversed and remanded.
2