Filed: May 03, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LAURIE TIMMONS and LAURA'S ) SECRET, LLC, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2684 ) SHAUNA S. GRIER; ROBERT ) L. GRIER; COURAGEOUS CAT, INC.; ) FRANCE CRUISING CORPORATION; ) and FLORIDA RENOVATIONS, LLC.; ) ) Appellees. ) _) Opinion filed May 3, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen Walker, Judge. Christopher M. Sierra, St. Pet
Summary: NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LAURIE TIMMONS and LAURA'S ) SECRET, LLC, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2684 ) SHAUNA S. GRIER; ROBERT ) L. GRIER; COURAGEOUS CAT, INC.; ) FRANCE CRUISING CORPORATION; ) and FLORIDA RENOVATIONS, LLC.; ) ) Appellees. ) _) Opinion filed May 3, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen Walker, Judge. Christopher M. Sierra, St. Pete..
More
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LAURIE TIMMONS and LAURA'S ) SECRET, LLC, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2684 ) SHAUNA S. GRIER; ROBERT ) L. GRIER; COURAGEOUS CAT, INC.; ) FRANCE CRUISING CORPORATION; ) and FLORIDA RENOVATIONS, LLC.; ) ) Appellees. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 3, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen Walker, Judge. Christopher M. Sierra, St. Petersburg, for Appellants. Melinda Delpech of Band Law Group, P.L., Sarasota, for Appellee, Shauna S. Grier. Philip J. Schipani, Sarasota, for Appellee, Robert L. Grier. No appearance for remaining Appellees. BADALAMENTI, Judge. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction appellants' challenge to the trial court's July 13, 2018, order denying as an emergency Shauna Grier's verified emergency motion to compel compliance with court order and for contempt. The order is a nonfinal, nonappealable order. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130. Based on the limited record before us and the fact that a motion to dissolve is pending, we affirm the trial court's separate order that is in the nature of a temporary injunction—freezing assets and requiring deposit of funds—without prejudice to either party to seek review of any appealable order entered following resolution of the motion to dissolve. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part. SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur. -2-