Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Akamau Johnson v. State of Florida, 18-3056 (2019)

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida Number: 18-3056 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-3056 _ AKAMAU JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _ Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction. July 9, 2019 PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits. WETHERELL and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur; MAKAR, J., dissents with opinion. _ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _ MAKAR, J., dissenting. The hearing officer in this case r
More
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D18-3056 _____________________________ AKAMAU JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Belated Appeal—Original Jurisdiction. July 9, 2019 PER CURIAM. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits. WETHERELL and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur; MAKAR, J., dissents with opinion. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ MAKAR, J., dissenting. The hearing officer in this case read the petitioner’s factual allegations too narrowly in concluding that no factual issues exist and that the only issue presented is “strictly a matter of law.” Rather, Petitioner says he was transferred from one institution to another, and was thereafter in lockdown for ten days, resulting in denial of access to his “legal work,” which may include legal papers, correspondence, orders, and so on. The current record fails to establish when Petitioner received the order at issue he seeks to appeal; presumably some mail log exists to show when he received it. Because the trial court deemed the matter a purely legal issue, no factual findings were made on this important factual point. For these reasons, an amended Staley order is appropriate. _____________________________ Akamau Johnson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer