Filed: Aug. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-4708 _ STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. BRIAN ORLANDO HEATH, Respondent. _ Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction. August 30, 2019 PER CURIAM. In second-tier certiorari proceedings, this Court’s review is limited to a determination of whether the circuit court “[1] afforded procedural due process and [2] applied the correct law.” City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So.
Summary: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-4708 _ STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Petitioner, v. BRIAN ORLANDO HEATH, Respondent. _ Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction. August 30, 2019 PER CURIAM. In second-tier certiorari proceedings, this Court’s review is limited to a determination of whether the circuit court “[1] afforded procedural due process and [2] applied the correct law.” City of Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant, 419 So. 2..
More
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D18-4708
_____________________________
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT
OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR
VEHICLES,
Petitioner,
v.
BRIAN ORLANDO HEATH,
Respondent.
_____________________________
Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
August 30, 2019
PER CURIAM.
In second-tier certiorari proceedings, this Court’s review is
limited to a determination of whether the circuit court “[1] afforded
procedural due process and [2] applied the correct law.” City of
Deerfield Beach v. Vaillant,
419 So. 2d 624, 626 (Fla. 1982); see
also Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Edenfield,
58 So.
3d 904, 906 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Here, the Department did not
assert a violation of procedural due process and it failed to
demonstrate a violation of a clearly established principle of law
which resulted in a miscarriage of justice. We, therefore, deny the
Petition for Writ of Certiorari. See Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto.
Ins. Co.,
62 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. 2010).
Petition DENIED.
ROWE, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Christie S. Utt, General Counsel, and Elana J. Jones, Assistant
General Counsel, for the Department of Highway Safety & Motor
Vehicles, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.
Hoot Crawford, Panama City, for Respondent.
2