Filed: Dec. 02, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT December 2, 2005 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 05-11573 CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00020-CR-OC-10-GRJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARMELO MIGUEL GARCIA, a.k.a. Mikey, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 2, 2005) Before DUBINA, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT December 2, 2005 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 05-11573 CLERK Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 04-00020-CR-OC-10-GRJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARMELO MIGUEL GARCIA, a.k.a. Mikey, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 2, 2005) Before DUBINA, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges. P..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
December 2, 2005
THOMAS K. KAHN
No. 05-11573 CLERK
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 04-00020-CR-OC-10-GRJ
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CARMELO MIGUEL GARCIA,
a.k.a. Mikey,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(December 2, 2005)
Before DUBINA, HULL and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Goettel Jr., appointed counsel for Carmelo Miguel Garcia in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Garcia’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2