[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT November 3, 2005 No. 04-15208 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK D. C. Docket No. 03-03028 CV-ODE-1 MELVIN THIESSEN, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, versus FORD MOTOR COMPANY, UNITED AUTOMOBILE WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 882, INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE WORKERS OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees, INTERNATIONAL UNION, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (November 3, 2005) Before TJOFLAT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges, and LAWSON*, District Judge. PER CURIAM: AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1 *Honorable Hugh Lawson, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation. 1 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides: When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist: (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record; (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion. 2