Filed: Aug. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201600170 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. THOMAS L. HICKS Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy -Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Major M.D. Sameit, USMC. For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _ Decided 9 August 2016 _ Before FISCHER, RUGH, and BELSKY, Appellate Military Judges _ After careful consideration of t
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201600170 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. THOMAS L. HICKS Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy -Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Major M.D. Sameit, USMC. For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _ Decided 9 August 2016 _ Before FISCHER, RUGH, and BELSKY, Appellate Military Judges _ After careful consideration of th..
More
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
_________________________
No. 201600170
_________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee
v.
THOMAS L. HICKS
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
_________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy -Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Major M.D. Sameit, USMC.
For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
Decided 9 August 2016
_________________________
Before FISCHER, RUGH, and BELSKY, Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening
authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).
The supplemental court-martial order will reflect that Specifications 1 and 2
under Charge II were merged for sentencing and that Specifications 4 and 5
under Charge II were merged for findings and sentencing.
For the Court
R.H. TROIDL
Clerk of Court