Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201800153 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. Ahmed A. MEGEED Seaman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander Hayes C. Larsen, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Major David A. Peters, USMCR. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _ Decided 31 October 2018 _ Before HUTCHISON, LAWRENCE, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military Judges _ After careful con
Summary: U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _ No. 201800153 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. Ahmed A. MEGEED Seaman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge: Commander Hayes C. Larsen, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Major David A. Peters, USMCR. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq. _ Decided 31 October 2018 _ Before HUTCHISON, LAWRENCE, and ELLINGTON, Appellate Military Judges _ After careful cons..
More
U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS
C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS
_________________________
No. 201800153
_________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee
v.
Ahmed A. MEGEED
Seaman Apprentice (E-2), U.S. Navy
Appellant
_________________________
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge: Commander Hayes C. Larsen, JAGC, USN.
For Appellant: Major David A. Peters, USMCR.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
Decided 31 October 2018
_________________________
Before HUTCHISON, LAWRENCE, and ELLINGTON,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assign-
ment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the con-
vening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §
866(c). The supplemental court-martial order shall reflect that the govern-
ment withdrew Specifications 7 and 11 of Charge III and dismissed them
without prejudice, to ripen into prejudice upon completion of appellate
review; thus the appellant was not found Not Guilty of those specifications.
Record at 109.
FOR THE COURT
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court