Filed: Feb. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Rocky RODRIGUEZ Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800265 Decided: 8 February 2019 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., USMC Sentence adjudged 11 May 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority:
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Rocky RODRIGUEZ Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800265 Decided: 8 February 2019 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., USMC Sentence adjudged 11 May 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: ..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Rocky RODRIGUEZ
Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800265
Decided: 8 February 2019
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge:
Lieutenant Colonel Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., USMC
Sentence adjudged 11 May 2018 by a general court-martial convened
at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting
alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: a reprimand, reduc-
tion to E-1, confinement for 5 years, 1 and a dishonorable discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Colonel Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.
For Appellee:
Brian Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before WOODARD, TANG, and LAWRENCE,
Appellate Military Judges.
1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 30 months pursu-
ant to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Rodriguez, No. 201800265
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§
859(a), 866(c).
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2