Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Raymond W. BEGAY Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800332 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Decided: 28 February 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey V. Munoz, USMC. Sentence adjudged 25 July 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by con
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Raymond W. BEGAY Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800332 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Decided: 28 February 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey V. Munoz, USMC. Sentence adjudged 25 July 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by conv..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Raymond W. BEGAY
Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800332
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Decided: 28 February 2019.
Military Judge:
Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey V. Munoz, USMC.
Sentence adjudged 25 July 2018 by a general court-martial convened
at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, CA, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: reduc-
tion to E-1, confinement for 7 years, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant:
Major David A. Peters, USMCR.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before WOODARD, HUTCHISON, and ELLINGTON
Appellate Military Judges.
United States v. Begay, No. 201800332
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2