Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Travis L. PETTIBONE Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800359 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 21 March 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC. Sentence adjudged 23 August 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convenin
Summary: United States Navy–Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Travis L. PETTIBONE Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201800359 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 21 March 2019. Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC. Sentence adjudged 23 August 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening..
More
United States Navy–Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Travis L. PETTIBONE
Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201800359
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 21 March 2019.
Military Judge:
Lieutenant Colonel Emily A. Jackson-Hall, USMC.
Sentence adjudged 23 August 2018 by a special court-martial
convened at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military
judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority:
reduction to E-1, confinement for 90 days, and a bad-conduct
discharge.
For Appellant:
Lieutenant Commander Jacqueline M. Leonard, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
Before HUTCHISON, LAWRENCE, and STEPHENS
Appellate Military Judges.
United States v. Pettibone, No. 201800359
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2