Filed: Apr. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Geoffrey R. MILLS Aviation Electronics Technician First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800362 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 5 April 2019. Military Judge: Commander Shane E. Johnson, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 20 August 2018 by a general court-martial con- vened at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, consisting of a mil- itary judge sitting alone. Senten
Summary: United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Geoffrey R. MILLS Aviation Electronics Technician First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201800362 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Decided: 5 April 2019. Military Judge: Commander Shane E. Johnson, JAGC, USN. Sentence adjudged 20 August 2018 by a general court-martial con- vened at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, consisting of a mil- itary judge sitting alone. Sentenc..
More
United States Navy-Marine Corps
Court of Criminal Appeals
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Geoffrey R. MILLS
Aviation Electronics Technician First Class (E-6), U.S. Navy
Appellant
No. 201800362
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Decided: 5 April 2019.
Military Judge:
Commander Shane E. Johnson, JAGC, USN.
Sentence adjudged 20 August 2018 by a general court-martial con-
vened at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, consisting of a mil-
itary judge sitting alone. Sentence approved by convening authority:
reduction to E-1, confinement for 18 months, 1 and a dishonorable dis-
charge.
For Appellant:
Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee:
Lieutenant George R. Lewis, JAGC, USN.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
1The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 12 months pursu-
ant to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Mills, No. 201800362
Before HUTCHINSON, TANG, and GERDING,
Appellate Military Judges.
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2