Filed: May 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before FULTON, HITESMAN, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tammy SAECHAO Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900006 Decided: 29 May 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judges: Major John Ferriter, USMC (arraignment); Colonel Matt Kent, USMC (trial). Sentence adjudged 25 September 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Mari
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before FULTON, HITESMAN, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tammy SAECHAO Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900006 Decided: 29 May 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judges: Major John Ferriter, USMC (arraignment); Colonel Matt Kent, USMC (trial). Sentence adjudged 25 September 2018 by a general court-martial convened at Marin..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
FULTON, HITESMAN, and RUSSELL,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Tammy SAECHAO
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900006
Decided: 29 May 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judges: Major John Ferriter, USMC (arraignment); Colonel
Matt Kent, USMC (trial). Sentence adjudged 25 September 2018 by a
general court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pend-
leton, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence
approved by convening authority: reduction to E-1, confinement for 13
months, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Major Matthew A. Blackwood, USMCR.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
United States v. Saechao, No. 201900006
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2