Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Gallardo-Ramirez, 201900064 (2019)

Court: Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals Number: 201900064 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before WOODARD, HITESMAN, and KOVAC, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jose A. GALLARDO-RAMIREZ Airman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy Appellant No. 201900064 Decided: 20 June 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Jonathan T. Stephens, JAGC, USN. Sentence ad- judged 5 November 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Base San Diego, California, con
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.




                               Before
                  WOODARD, HITESMAN, and KOVAC,
                      Appellate Military Judges

                        _________________________

                          UNITED STATES
                              Appellee

                                     v.

                 Jose A. GALLARDO-RAMIREZ
                   Airman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy
                             Appellant

                             No. 201900064

                          Decided: 20 June 2019.

 Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
 Military Judge: Jonathan T. Stephens, JAGC, USN. Sentence ad-
 judged 5 November 2018 by a special court-martial convened at Naval
 Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military judge sitting
 alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: confinement for 10
 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

 For Appellant: Captain Scott F. Hallauer, JAGC, USN.

 For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

                        _________________________

      This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
            NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

                        _________________________
             United States v. Gallardo-Ramirez, No. 201900064


PER CURIAM:
    After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
  The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.

                                FOR THE COURT:




                                RODGER A. DREW, JR.
                                Clerk of Court




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer