Filed: Aug. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and GERRITY Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Victor A. CABALLERO-GARCIA Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900092 Decided: 29 August 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major John L. Ferriter, USMC. Sentence adjudged 9 January 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona,
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before TANG, LAWRENCE, and GERRITY Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Victor A. CABALLERO-GARCIA Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900092 Decided: 29 August 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major John L. Ferriter, USMC. Sentence adjudged 9 January 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Air Station Yuma, Arizona, ..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
TANG, LAWRENCE, and GERRITY
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Victor A. CABALLERO-GARCIA
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900092
Decided: 29 August 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Major John L. Ferriter, USMC. Sentence adjudged 9
January 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Air
Station Yuma, Arizona, consisting of a military judge sitting alone.
Sentence approved by convening authority: reduction to E-1, hard la-
bor without confinement for 15 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Major James S. Kresge, USMC.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are cor-
rect in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s
substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
United States v. Caballero-Garcia, No. 201900092
The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are
AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2