Filed: Oct. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and ATTANASIO, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Robert TYSON Jr. Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900109 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Keato H. Harrell. Sentence adjudged 18 Janu- ary 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and ATTANASIO, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Robert TYSON Jr. Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900109 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Keato H. Harrell. Sentence adjudged 18 Janu- ary 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina,..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HITESMAN, GASTON, and ATTANASIO,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Robert TYSON Jr.
Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900109
Decided: 30 October 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Major Keato H. Harrell. Sentence adjudged 18 Janu-
ary 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting
alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to E-
1, confinement for 4 months, 1 and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Jaqueline M. Leonard, JAGC,
USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 63 days pursuant
to a pretrial agreement.
United States v. Tyson Jr., No. 201900109
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2