Filed: Oct. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and KOVAC, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Emmanuel R. RIVAS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900162 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Terrence J. Reese, USMC. Sentence adjudged 26 March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Ca
Summary: This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition. Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and KOVAC, Appellate Military Judges _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Emmanuel R. RIVAS Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant No. 201900162 Decided: 30 October 2019. Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. Military Judge: Major Terrence J. Reese, USMC. Sentence adjudged 26 March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Car..
More
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.
Before
HITESMAN, GASTON, and KOVAC,
Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES
Appellee
v.
Emmanuel R. RIVAS
Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps
Appellant
No. 201900162
Decided: 30 October 2019.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Major Terrence J. Reese, USMC. Sentence adjudged
26 March 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps
Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sit-
ting alone. Sentence approved by the convening authority: reduction to
E-1, confinement for 150 days, and a bad-conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under
NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
_________________________
PER CURIAM:
After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law
and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the appellant’s substan-
tial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
United States v. Rivas, No. 201900162
The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR.
Clerk of Court
2